🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, threatening messages continued. At first, reportedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, subsequently from the authorities. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was summoned to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is one of many fighting a expensive redevelopment plan where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – will be bulldozed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is exceptional in the planet," says the resident. "But their intention is to eradicate our social fabric and silence our voices."

Opposing Environments

The cramped lanes of the slum present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Residences are assembled randomly and frequently missing basic amenities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is saturated with the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

Among some individuals, the vision of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and residences with two toilets is an optimistic future realized.

"We don't have adequate medical facilities, roads or drainage and there's nowhere for kids to enjoy," explains A Selvin Nadar, 56, who migrated from Tamil Nadu in 1982. "The single option is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, such as the leather artisan, are resisting the redevelopment.

Everyone acknowledges that this community, long neglected as informal housing, is urgently needing financial support and improvement. However they fear that this initiative – lacking resident participation – is one that will transform premium city property into a playground for the rich, evicting the lower-caste, working-class residents who have lived there since generations ago.

These were these shunned, migrant workers who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and business activity, whose production is valued at between a significant amount and a substantial sum a year, making it one of the world's largest unofficial markets.

Displacement Concerns

Of the roughly 1 million residents living in the dense 2.2 square kilometer area, fewer than half will be able for replacement housing in the project, which is expected to take seven years to finish. Additional residents will be transferred to wastelands and saline fields on the distant periphery of Mumbai, threatening to fragment a historic neighborhood. Certain individuals will be denied residences at all.

Residents permitted to stay in the neighborhood will be provided apartments in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the evolved, collective approach of dwelling and laboring that has maintained this area for generations.

Industries from tailoring to ceramic crafts and recycling are expected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to a designated "commercial zone" separated from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of the leather artisan, a leather artisan and third generation of his family to live in the slum, the project presents a fundamental risk. His informal, three-storey workshop makes apparel – tailored coats, premium outerwear, decorated jackets – sold in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and abroad.

His family lives in the rooms downstairs and laborers and garment workers – laborers from north India – reside in the same building, allowing him to afford their labour. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are frequently 10 times costlier for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the government offices nearby, a visual representation of the redevelopment plan illustrates a contrasting outlook. Well-groomed people move around on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, acquiring western-style baked goods and croissants and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area adjacent to a coffee shop and treat station. It is a world away from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that sustains local residents.

"This is not progress for us," says the protester. "This constitutes a huge land development that will price people out for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the business conglomerate. Run by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the government head – the conglomerate has faced accusations of favoritism and questionable practices, which it denies.

Even as local authorities describes it as a joint project, the corporation contributed $950m for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the initiative was improperly granted to the business group is pending in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to publicly resist the development, Shaikh and other residents state they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – involving phone calls, explicit warnings and suggestions that criticizing the initiative was comparable with speaking against the country – by figures they assert represent the business conglomerate.

Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c