🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a proposed legislation that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Recently, international health experts raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.