🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. His harder version prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it might seek to question.